Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
25.6 weeks
55.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The reviewing process was a long process, with no information about the status of the manuscript in between.
The comments of the reviewers were of good quality and allowed us to improve the manuscript, which was very positive.
The comments of the reviewers were of good quality and allowed us to improve the manuscript, which was very positive.