Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.0 weeks
13.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Adequate review process in the first round, but after revision in accordance with the reviewers' requests, the manuscript length was increased, and the editor thus requested that significant cuts be made which was burdensome and did not make the manuscript better. Word limits seem more important than quality.