Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.6 weeks
15.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
0
0
Rejected
2020
Motivation: One reviewer was adamant that the ideas presented were of 'no physiological relevance' and yet did not give concrete suggestions on how to improve the manuscript due to what we believe is an internal bias. This is the rudest and most condescending review I have ever received, and it was clear, to me, that the reviewer did not understand the premise of the experiment, nor read the manuscript in its entirety.