Reviews for "European Journal of Ageing"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a 2 3
Accepted 2015
Motivation: This review process was hard to pass, some of the comments contradictory between reviewers or between review rounds. The journal offers double-blind review, which we requested but during the review process it showed up that we as authors are not blinded and this information for authors is not valid. However, the process was still of rather high quality and helped our paper to improve. We were also enabled to prolong a period of resibmitting.