Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.4 weeks
11.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2025
Motivation:
Two reviewers. First reviewer's comments were almost 2 pages long. I have a strong suspicion that they were generated by an AI because of the length of the review and the vagueness of a lot of the comments and the structure of the comments. Also a few of the comments referenced things that we did not mention anywhere in our paper. It's impossible to confirm if it was AI-generated but it's just a hunch based on the aforementioned reasons. The second reviewer's comments were very helpful and I think will improve our manuscript for when we resubmit again. Sad that the decision for rejection took nearly 3 months but oh well.