Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
24.9 weeks
24.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1.0 / 5.0
1.0 / 5.0
Rejected
Motivation:
One of the reviewer reports (the negative one, the other one was suggesting a revision) was clearly generated by an LLM. I complained to the editors stating that I had not authorized the reviewers to share my manuscript with LLMs. The editors and the SAGE ethics team told me that they were going to investigate the issue. I made multiple inquiries to be informed about the results of this investigation, but I did not receive any response.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Rejected
Motivation:
Although my article was rejected, the review procedure was very fast, and communication with the journal very efficient
13.0 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Accepted