Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
Immediately accepted after 2.6 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2023
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
10.8 weeks
13.8 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
4.7 weeks
6.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
4.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
High quality reviews provided in less than 1 month, even if generally 2-3 review&resubmit cycles are necessary. The manuscript quality was strongly improved, and the overall reviewing process was quiet fast. Strongly recommended.
27.9 weeks
28.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
Waiting for the first response was a bit long in my opinion (27.9 weeks) and there was only one reviewer. Review process after that point was very quick. Review was not very detailed (minor revision), but addressed some important points of the manuscript.
6.0 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
8.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The overall review process was relatively quick. The comments of the reviewers were, in my opinion, valid but polite.
6.4 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
n/a
n/a
42 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013