Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Immediately accepted after 2.6 weeks
Accepted (im.)
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
10.8 weeks
13.8 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
4.7 weeks
6.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
4.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: High quality reviews provided in less than 1 month, even if generally 2-3 review&resubmit cycles are necessary. The manuscript quality was strongly improved, and the overall reviewing process was quiet fast. Strongly recommended.
27.9 weeks
28.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Waiting for the first response was a bit long in my opinion (27.9 weeks) and there was only one reviewer. Review process after that point was very quick. Review was not very detailed (minor revision), but addressed some important points of the manuscript.
6.0 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
5
Accepted
8.7 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: The overall review process was relatively quick. The comments of the reviewers were, in my opinion, valid but polite.
6.4 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
n/a
n/a
42 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)