Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.3 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2021
7.4 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2020
9.0 weeks
12.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016
Motivation: Manuscript submission was relatively simple and we received the first round of reviews in just over 2 months. The reviews were constructive and fair, and the manuscript was improved in quality after resubmission. The handling of the manuscript seemed prompt, fair, and diligent. Overall, I had a positive experience with ERL.
15.4 weeks
16.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016
Motivation: The reviews were helpful and suggested several important improvements to our paper. The review process was a bit slow for a 'letters' journal (>3 months) but not too bad. After submitting revisions, a decision was made quickly.