Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.1 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2024
Motivation: Very fast, fair comments. The editor also provided useful comments on the manuscript, and made a very fast decision.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
5.9 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2021
Motivation: This journal is quick in review process. All reviewers are friendly and put energy to improve the ms. Especially, Editor is wonderful, quick in response, and so friendly in word use.
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
7.4 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: The review process was very easy and clear. The suggestions made by the reviewers were good and improved the manuscript.
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2018
7.4 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Rejected
2017
6.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2013
Motivation: It seems they had problems finding reviewers, hence the long first round. Otherwise they were rather fast and the paper appeared online after a month; with page number.