Reviews for "Environmental Monitoring and Assessment"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 22.4
weeks
22.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: The review period was too long (almost 6 months) and the editor decided to reject the paper, even having only minor revisions from the two reviewers.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 18.9
weeks
50.7
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: The waiting time for a first response was very long (from August, 2016 until January, 2017) over the expected/average 54 days showed on the journals page (http://www.springer.com/environment/monitoring+-+environmental+analysis/journal/10661). After resubmitting the paper, the final response also took a long time (February, 2017 until September, 2017), considering that just minor chances were made to the paper.
After acceptance, the publishing process was fast and well handled.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 15.6
weeks
16.3
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 34.7
weeks
52.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Accepted
Motivation: It took several emails to the editor to get the original reviews. Eight months is way too long to wait for reviews.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: review process takes too much time