Reviews for "Environmental Modelling and Software"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Environmental Modelling and Software | 47.7 weeks |
60.8 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Environmental Modelling and Software | 17.4 weeks |
17.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 1 (bad) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The journal is fast, and the editors are very responsible, however, the quality of reviewer's comments are low and biased. One reviewer clearly neither has a good understanding of the methodology nor carefully read the manuscript, given 1) give comments that are theoretically incorrect on the model; 2) point out a limitation that has already been properly dealt with as a major problem. In conclusion, as a top-tier journal, the experience is really disappointing. | |||||||
Environmental Modelling and Software | 35.7 weeks |
35.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The quality of the reviews was excellent, increasing the manuscript quality a lot. However the overall review process was too long. | |||||||
Environmental Modelling and Software | n/a | n/a | 44.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Although the paper presented a systemic modelling work with R-programmed Morris sensitivity analysis that could be useful for other models, the decision was "your paper is a bit too narrowly focused and hence doesn't fit within the scope of the journal". Such a decision came after 1.5 months, which is quite long given that no further constructive comment was provided. |
|||||||
Environmental Modelling and Software | n/a | n/a | 4.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Environmental Modelling and Software | n/a | n/a | 54.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: The first internal review was a bit long (almost 2 months) given the output (rejection without external review). However, elements were provided in order to improve the paper quality. | |||||||
Environmental Modelling and Software | 13.0 weeks |
15.0 weeks |
n/a | 5 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Environmental Modelling and Software | 25.1 weeks |
25.3 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Environmental Modelling and Software | 12.0 weeks |
12.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |