Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.6 weeks
3.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Rejected
2019
Motivation: The review process was very rapid. Review comments were constructive but limited in scope. Editor assessment was constructive but limited in scope. All correspondence was handled professionally.
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
0
0
Accepted
2012
Motivation: Editor was slow, arrogant and not very competent for our theme of research.