Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.0 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2023
Motivation: The editor was professional and the reviewer was shown to extract errors in the manuscript.
27.0 weeks
60.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2021
13.0 weeks
56.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2019
Motivation: After 20 months my papers were accepted. 4 times revised manuscripts, the first is reject and resubmit, the second is major revised, third is minor revised, and the fourth was accepted. Thanks two reviewers and the editor of the journal are polite with authors.
21.7 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2011
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Results of my research related to the contamination of heavy metals in the environment (research area - chemistry and geochemistry) has published in international peer-reviewed journals (20 papers), four chapters in monographs international character, and reported on over 30 international and national scientific conferences.
12.4 weeks
22.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Overall the authors are satisfied with the review process. We would send our paper to EES again without any problems. We only had some doubts about the number of the reviewers; we received one review, but from the first editorial response we understood there were at least two. When we wrote to the Editor asking about the second review, we didn't receive any response, so we concluded there was only one reviewer. However, we'd prefer to get a response from the Editor. Beside this, we’d like to emphasise that our experience with EES Journal was very good and we appreciate their decision to publish our paper.
15.2 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Good revisions; 180 days from 1st submission to final decision