Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Accepted
2020
6.0 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2017
0.9 weeks
1.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Extremely fast reviewing process. Fairly adequate comments and suggestions. Editing and type-setting phase is proper.
5.7 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
5
Accepted
2012
Motivation: Given the great difference in the opinions of the two reviewers, the editor made a huge effort to personally check the MS, acting as third reviewer and reconsidering the work as worth to be published.