Reviews for "Environment and Planning B"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
39.0 weeks	39.0 weeks	n/a	2	2 (moderate)	1 (bad)	Rejected	2019
Motivation: Three months after I submitted the article, I emailed the editor. They said they had trouble finding the reviewers. As a result of 9 months, I received two peer reviews and the result is reject. I'm very upset because one of the review was 3 sentences. The other reviewer's opinion is whether the article was suitable for the journal. I think this should be the editor's decision. This reviewer offered me another journal. I don't think the referee process is going well.
11.0 weeks	21.7 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2016