Reviews for "Environment and Planning B"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
39.0
weeks
39.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected 2019
Motivation: Three months after I submitted the article, I emailed the editor. They said they had trouble finding the reviewers. As a result of 9 months, I received two peer reviews and the result is reject. I'm very upset because one of the review was 3 sentences. The other reviewer's opinion is whether the article was suitable for the journal. I think this should be the editor's decision. This reviewer offered me another journal. I don't think the referee process is going well.
11.0
weeks
21.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016