Reviews for "eNeuro"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
eNeuro 4.3
weeks
6.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
eNeuro 3.0
weeks
3.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The review was fast. The reviewers' comments were insightful and helpful.
eNeuro 2.4
weeks
2.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was very great. The comments in first round review were excellent, from both methodological and theoretical aspects, and it's done in 17 days! When we resubmit it, the editor just accepted our article few hours later. I was very satisfied with all the processes.
eNeuro 3.1
weeks
5.1
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: I thought the review cycles were fairly rapid. I found the comments from the first round of reviews to be thoughtful and pertinent, and although additional experiments were required to address the reviewers' comments, those additional experiments substantially improved the manuscript. Overall, I thought the reviewing editor did an excellent job in handling this manuscript throughout the review process.
eNeuro 4.0
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
5
(excellent)
Rejected
Motivation: The paper was judged to preliminary by the journal and was rejected in reasonable delay.