Reviews for "Energy Research and Social Science"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Energy Research and Social Science | 8.7 weeks |
34.7 weeks |
n/a | 5 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The process was lengthy and some reviews appeared contradictory and unreasonable. Nevertheless the editors were good, approachable and easy to communicate with. I feel that the process could have been shorter if better reviewers were in place. |
|||||||
Energy Research and Social Science | 2.7 weeks |
6.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Benjamin Sovacool and his team are THE SUPREME journal editors. Quick turnaround time, personalized service, and excellent review quality. I knew that such quality was possible, but I had never seen it before in my 20 years in academia. HATS OFF to ERSS. | |||||||
Energy Research and Social Science | 9.6 weeks |
24.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Very efficient review process. The only higher ranking energy journal I have written for where I believe the editors take a sincere interest in the papers that are accepted for publication. |