Reviews for "Energy Research and Social Science"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Energy Research and Social Science 15.4
weeks		 23.9
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The feedback of the reviewers was very constructive and helpful, which improved the paper greatly. Benjamin Sovacool's personal comments further showed the interest in the paper and was very much appreciated. Overall smooth and timely revision process!
Energy Research and Social Science 8.7
weeks		 34.7
weeks		 n/a 5 3
(good)		 3
(good)		 Accepted
Motivation: The process was lengthy and some reviews appeared contradictory and unreasonable.
Nevertheless the editors were good, approachable and easy to communicate with.
I feel that the process could have been shorter if better reviewers were in place.
Energy Research and Social Science 2.7
weeks		 6.3
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Benjamin Sovacool and his team are THE SUPREME journal editors. Quick turnaround time, personalized service, and excellent review quality. I knew that such quality was possible, but I had never seen it before in my 20 years in academia. HATS OFF to ERSS.
Energy Research and Social Science 9.6
weeks		 24.0
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Very efficient review process. The only higher ranking energy journal I have written for where I believe the editors take a sincere interest in the papers that are accepted for publication.