Reviews for "Energy and Buildings"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Energy and Buildings n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Energy and Buildings 5.6
weeks
9.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The reviewers took their time, but the constructive and critical reviews were a big contribution to improve the manuscript. The entire review and publication process was without problems.
Energy and Buildings n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Energy and Buildings 73.8
weeks
73.8
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: Review process took very long time.
Energy and Buildings 17.4
weeks
19.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The time and and quality of the process were reasonable.
Energy and Buildings 7.6
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted