Reviews for "Energy and Buildings"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Energy and Buildings | n/a | n/a | 14.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Energy and Buildings | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Energy and Buildings | 5.6 weeks |
9.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The reviewers took their time, but the constructive and critical reviews were a big contribution to improve the manuscript. The entire review and publication process was without problems. | |||||||
Energy and Buildings | n/a | n/a | 4.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Energy and Buildings | 73.8 weeks |
73.8 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 1 (bad) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Review process took very long time. | |||||||
Energy and Buildings | 17.4 weeks |
19.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The time and and quality of the process were reasonable. | |||||||
Energy and Buildings | 7.6 weeks |
9.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |