Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
57.4 weeks
64.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
Comments from reviewers concerned the global understanding and quality of English of the article, extending the literature references with pertinent suggestions.
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
5.6 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The reviewers took their time, but the constructive and critical reviews were a big contribution to improve the manuscript. The entire review and publication process was without problems.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
73.8 weeks
73.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Review process took very long time.
17.4 weeks
19.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
The time and and quality of the process were reasonable.
7.6 weeks
9.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012