Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.0 weeks
3.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
4
Accepted
2019
Motivation: The review process was handled very well. Only one reviewer gave bad comments.
1.3 weeks
2.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: The review process of Energies is very fast. However, the first round of reviews was not of a high quality, even if they found my paper very interesting. After the second round, I received another review report, which this time make to improve the quality of the paper.
4.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015