Reviews for "Energies"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Energies | 2.0 weeks |
3.4 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The review process was handled very well. Only one reviewer gave bad comments. | |||||||
Energies | 1.3 weeks |
2.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The review process of Energies is very fast. However, the first round of reviews was not of a high quality, even if they found my paper very interesting. After the second round, I received another review report, which this time make to improve the quality of the paper. | |||||||
Energies | 4.3 weeks |
5.3 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |