Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Rejected
2018
Motivation: The editorial decision to reject the paper felt unfair regarding the reviewers comments, however the reviewing process was extremely fast. They offered to transfer the paper to another journal or to execute the revisions anyway, however we switched to another journal after that.
7.0 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
2018
5.6 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Very nice journal regarding choosing reviewers and their comments.
2.7 weeks
2.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2011
Motivation: The review process was very simple and the publication of the paper was fast and very well performed.