Reviews for "Empirical Economics"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Empirical Economics	15.1 weeks	35.9 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Empirical Economics	n/a	n/a	30.4 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Empirical Economics	Motivation: This is not my first experience with this journal. Four years ago an editor rejected my journal based on a referee report concerning SOMEONE ELSE'S paper. When I complained he apologized and told me to wait. Three months later I got a rejection again based on a different referee report concerning somebody ELSE'S manuscript again. This time the paper was simply rejected because it contained no empirical part. However, I can cite several papers in this same journal where the published papers contained no empirical either. Interestingly, in both cases my paper was handled by the same editor. I doubt if I will ever submit my paper to this journal again.
Empirical Economics	78.0 weeks	111.1 weeks	n/a	2	3 (good)	1 (bad)	Accepted
Empirical Economics	Motivation: The paper was simply not forwarded for months. After a year we had to ask twice until we got an answer and the paper was forwarded to reviewers.
Empirical Economics	n/a	n/a	58.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Empirical Economics	Motivation: Editorial rejection took too long (about two months).