Reviews for "Empirical Economics"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Empirical Economics | n/a | n/a | 30.4 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: This is not my first experience with this journal. Four years ago an editor rejected my journal based on a referee report concerning SOMEONE ELSE'S paper. When I complained he apologized and told me to wait. Three months later I got a rejection again based on a different referee report concerning somebody ELSE'S manuscript again. This time the paper was simply rejected because it contained no empirical part. However, I can cite several papers in this same journal where the published papers contained no empirical either. Interestingly, in both cases my paper was handled by the same editor. I doubt if I will ever submit my paper to this journal again. |
|||||||
Empirical Economics | 78.0 weeks |
111.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The paper was simply not forwarded for months. After a year we had to ask twice until we got an answer and the paper was forwarded to reviewers. | |||||||
Empirical Economics | n/a | n/a | 58.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Editorial rejection took too long (about two months). |