Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
15.1 weeks
35.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
n/a
n/a
30 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
This is not my first experience with this journal. Four years ago an editor rejected my journal based on a referee report concerning SOMEONE ELSE'S paper. When I complained he apologized and told me to wait. Three months later I got a rejection again based on a different referee report concerning somebody ELSE'S manuscript again.
This time the paper was simply rejected because it contained no empirical part. However, I can cite several papers in this same journal where the published papers contained no empirical either.
Interestingly, in both cases my paper was handled by the same editor. I doubt if I will ever submit my paper to this journal again.
This time the paper was simply rejected because it contained no empirical part. However, I can cite several papers in this same journal where the published papers contained no empirical either.
Interestingly, in both cases my paper was handled by the same editor. I doubt if I will ever submit my paper to this journal again.
78.0 weeks
111.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The paper was simply not forwarded for months. After a year we had to ask twice until we got an answer and the paper was forwarded to reviewers.
n/a
n/a
58 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
Editorial rejection took too long (about two months).