Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
25.4 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
29.0 weeks
29.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
My manuscript was in peer review assignment for six months. It was rejected a few days after the submission system switched to 'In peer review'. The single review report received was dismissive and seems likely to have come from the author whose work in the journal I was criticising.
0.9 weeks
0.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
43.6 weeks
43.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
Exceptionally slow review process, with no communication from the journal. Even when we requested updates they just gave non-specific responses. The slowness of review is not acceptable, especially as the manuscript was time sensitive in regards to its material.
26.7 weeks
27.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
Quick and professional review