Reviews for "Emerging Infectious Diseases"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Emerging Infectious Diseases 29.0
weeks
29.0
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: My manuscript was in peer review assignment for six months. It was rejected a few days after the submission system switched to 'In peer review'. The single review report received was dismissive and seems likely to have come from the author whose work in the journal I was criticising.
Emerging Infectious Diseases 0.9
weeks
0.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Emerging Infectious Diseases 43.6
weeks
43.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Exceptionally slow review process, with no communication from the journal. Even when we requested updates they just gave non-specific responses. The slowness of review is not acceptable, especially as the manuscript was time sensitive in regards to its material.
Emerging Infectious Diseases 26.7
weeks
27.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Emerging Infectious Diseases n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Quick and professional review