Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
25.4 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
2021
29.0 weeks
29.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
0
0
Rejected
2021
Motivation: My manuscript was in peer review assignment for six months. It was rejected a few days after the submission system switched to 'In peer review'. The single review report received was dismissive and seems likely to have come from the author whose work in the journal I was criticising.
0.9 weeks
0.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Rejected
2020
43.6 weeks
43.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
0
Rejected
2018
Motivation: Exceptionally slow review process, with no communication from the journal. Even when we requested updates they just gave non-specific responses. The slowness of review is not acceptable, especially as the manuscript was time sensitive in regards to its material.
26.7 weeks
27.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Accepted
2017
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation: Quick and professional review