Reviews for "ELT Journal"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
4.0
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: In my view it should have been a 'recommend revision and resubmission' decision. Instead, two of the reviewers seemed more concerned with the offence that might be caused to the 'high and mighty' in the profession.
4.0
weeks
4.0
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: Reviewers didn't really appear to have engaged sufficiently with the details of the text, and/or make enough effort to understand it properly.