Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
50.1 weeks
50.1 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
The review process took an obscenely long time and resulted in rejection. It was not only a matter of difficulties in finding reviewers but the paper sat with the editor and administrators for 2-3 months at different points in the process. Many comments received may be helpful in improving the text for re-submission elsewhere. Others were outright rude or seemed to overlook the fact that the excessively long review process contributed to making our study outdated.
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
6.9 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2017
12.0 weeks
13.4 weeks
n/a
5 reports
Accepted
2012