Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
50.1 weeks
50.1 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
The review process took an obscenely long time and resulted in rejection. It was not only a matter of difficulties in finding reviewers but the paper sat with the editor and administrators for 2-3 months at different points in the process. Many comments received may be helpful in improving the text for re-submission elsewhere. Others were outright rude or seemed to overlook the fact that the excessively long review process contributed to making our study outdated.
22.4 weeks
45.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2022
22.8 weeks
35.2 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
n/a
n/a
17 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Educational Research Review. I regret to inform you that your manuscript does not fit within the scope of the journal and we must therefore reject it. I am sorry to disappoint you with this decision and hope that you will be able to successfully submit your manuscript elsewhere. If you want to find an alternative, you can use our Journal Finder to search for other journals that could be better suited for publishing your manuscript.
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
6.9 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2017
12.0 weeks
13.4 weeks
n/a
5 reports
Accepted
2012