Reviews for "Economics Letters"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Economics Letters n/a n/a 10.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Editorial reject. The article was deemed too specific and not contributing to a wide audience.
Economics Letters 9.1
weeks
12.3
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Economics Letters used to be extremely slow. The current editorial team has really improved things.
Economics Letters n/a n/a 149.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Economics Letters 5.9
weeks
5.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Fast and efficient.
Economics Letters 60.8
weeks
60.8
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: the final review report did not touch the core issues, rather it used the fitness with the journal as the reason for rejection. But if so, it should not have taken 14 months to decide whether the paper fitted the journal or not.
Economics Letters n/a n/a 10.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Fast reply and constructive comment from editor.
Economics Letters 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 1 2
(moderate)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The referee recommended a minor revision, but an anonymous associate editor recommended rejection without providing a reason. The editor followed that recommendation without even looking into the report