Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.7 weeks
21.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
A bit lenghty review rounds but fair and tonthe point
13.3 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The reviewer reveals his/her lack of familiarity with the subject and knowledge about the technique with the comments s/he has made within the report. I would expect a quality review from a journal that old.
12.6 weeks
12.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
Reviewing time could have been faster for a relatively straightforward rejection.
5.1 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
Article was handled professionally and promptly, but rejection was based on a reviewer report that showed lack of familiarity with the article's subject.
21.9 weeks
30.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014