Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
31.4 weeks
47.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The review process was quite slow, with 7 months for the first round of reviews and 3.5 months for the revisions. Given that the revisions weren't even sent out to reviewers, they were just sitting on his/her desk that whole time!
The redeeming qualities were the managing editor, who was helpful, responsive, and sympathetic to the delays; and one of the two reviewers, which was insightful and improved the manuscript. I enjoy reading this journal, but likely will try to avoid publishing there again (at least until after I get tenure) due to the extremely slow turnaround time.
The redeeming qualities were the managing editor, who was helpful, responsive, and sympathetic to the delays; and one of the two reviewers, which was insightful and improved the manuscript. I enjoy reading this journal, but likely will try to avoid publishing there again (at least until after I get tenure) due to the extremely slow turnaround time.
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
Provided 3 alternative journals name but did not say why exactly why it did not.
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
I understand the issue of fit and appreciated the speedy rejection.
26.0 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2012