Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.7 weeks
7.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2022
13.1 weeks
20.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Very accommodating editor (having allowed additional delays due to the pandemic).
Very interesting comments from reviewers and editor. Taking them into account greatly improved the article.
Completely reasonable deadlines.
4.9 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
2020
5.6 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: All the reviewers had very important comments and we addressed all of them in the revised version. I also learned a lot while writing the revised version. It was a great experience.
3.0 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: Very fast handling times, excellent reviewer comments that helped to considerably improve the manuscript.
4.7 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: After rejection in Diversity and Distribution, I used trasfer to sister journal - Ecology and Evolution, making the review process shorter.
Immediately accepted after 4.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2017
Motivation: The paper was rejected by another journal, with a long list of potential edits and inquiries. I responded in details to this in the transferred version of the manuscript before submitting it to E&E.
12.3 weeks
24.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: The editorial process improve our work, but the entire process is too long.
15.9 weeks
17.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: I was impressed with the journal and how my manuscript was reviewed and finally accepted. The editors work with the authors to produce a high quality paper. I also appreciated that the editor made the decision to accept the paper after revision without sending it back to review, despite substantial changes. This greatly reduces the time to the publishing.