Reviews for "Ecological Modelling"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Ecological Modelling 6.4
weeks
11.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: I had a very positive experience with Ecological Modelling. The reviews were very thorough, constructive, and received quickly. The editor seemed fair and responsive. It was <1 week from the time the paper was accepted until a fully typeset version was online. Overall- highly recommended!
Ecological Modelling 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Ecological Modelling 8.7
weeks
9.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: Ecological Modelling was the fastest journal from submission to publication that I've ever experienced.
Ecological Modelling 15.2
weeks
19.5
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: I think the reviewers did a very good job at reviewing the paper, which has improved substantially before publication. The reviewing process took a relatively long time, but it was overall satisfactory.