Reviews for "Ecological Economics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Ecological Economics n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Ecological Economics 6.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 4 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Rejected 2021
Motivation: Our paper was rejected, but the response was quite quick and we received useful comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the manuscript.
Ecological Economics n/a n/a 0.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Ecological Economics 27.4
weeks
44.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2021
Motivation: What is clear from my experience is that authors must be prepared to micromanage the review process with this journal and be very pro-active (reminder e-mails may not be sent to tardy reviewers unless the author makes inquiries). After 5 months from first submission, with no word from the editor, I asked for a status update. I was told they hadn't heard back from one reviewer and that a reminder e-mail would be sent to them. A month later I hadn't heard back yet and sent a follow-up message. I received my first response from reviewers just days later. Again, waited a long time (3 months) after second submission before asking for a status update and, again, received reviewer responses only days later, so my inquiry likely prompted action.
Ecological Economics 8.7
weeks
8.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2020
Motivation: The process was very smooth and rather quick. However, the reviewers appear to be completely uninterested in the relevance of the results and appear to focus primarily on whether the method you use is an innovative complex econometric analysis. Thus I would advice to submit there only if you do carry out such an analysis.
Ecological Economics n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2019
Ecological Economics n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
Motivation: Very transparent and fair decision. Would definitely submit there again.
Ecological Economics 8.9
weeks
8.9
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2015
Motivation: I hope the reviewers focus on more about the quality of the paper and less on other factors.
Ecological Economics 38.6
weeks
38.6
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2016
Ecological Economics 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: Manuscript was sent out to reviewers. Response - a rejection - was received in exactly 3 months later.
Ecological Economics 17.4
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2014
Ecological Economics 10.0
weeks
14.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: The reviewers were critical, and their comments, criticism, and suggestions actually helped improve the manuscript a lot. The editor was very helpful too. So we thanked them in our acknowledgement section.