Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.7 weeks
19.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
1
Rejected
2018
Motivation: The editor didn't know about the existence of a fourth reviewer. We had actually received the comments of a fourth reviewer in an extra email one week after the first decision with comments of the first three reviewers. We appealed the decision, but it was still rejected.
35.6 weeks
41.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
2019
Motivation: Very slow to receive initial reviews, timed poorly - got caught up in the period where all the editors left in protest of the new OA policy.
9.4 weeks
9.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Rejected
2018
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2017
7.7 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Rejected
2017
10.1 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Rejected
2017
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
8.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
2015
8.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
2
Rejected
2015