Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.9 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Rejected
2018
12.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2012
Motivation: The speed of the reviews was very reasonable. In hindsight, the reviewers could have asked for aspects of the data be presented, which would have helped with its interpretation by subsequent studies. The aspect in point were the dates at which the disease pathogen were observed. But then it was not in the objectives of the paper to measure "when", but "where". Subsequent research questions are now "when".