Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.3 weeks
6.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2024
Motivation: I found the process of publishing my paper to be both enriching and professionally rewarding. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, providing valuable feedback that strengthened my work. The editorial team was responsive and supportive, ensuring a smooth journey from submission to publication. Overall, I appreciated the opportunity to contribute to our field and connect with fellow researchers through this platform.