Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
2
2
Rejected
2015
Motivation: They were relatively slow in sending the paper to a reviewer. However the overall process length was reasonable. The referee did not understand the potential value of the paper and just gave generic comments.