Reviews for "Developmental Cell"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Developmental Cell 6.0
n/a 3 3
Motivation: My main problem was the slowness of the process. The time to get editorial feedback back on our proposed scheme for a revision, and then the proposed scheme for the rebuttal and second small revisions, delayed things.
Also there was one reviewer who was quite unreasonable and asked for a lot of new experiments on the revised manuscript. The editor overrode them in the end, and focused on the one relevant issue they brought up, which I was grateful for.