Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.7 weeks
20.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
15.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2021
11.6 weeks
16.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
"I regret that on this occasion your work was considered to be more appropriate for a general dental journal being more clinically oriented and I have, therefore, to reject it."
n/a
n/a
15 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The quality of some of the published papers is a mere shame, so I am happy this editor rejected consistently all the papers (2 or 3) we submitted. Imagine that a paper on the fatigue behavior of titanium alloy dental implants.....does not belong to "dental materials". That really makes me wonder. What is more sad is the lack of reaction of Elsevier who decided not to interfere with the decision. papers were never sent for review, they were rejected outright with a standard letter. The Editor ignored all correspondence.