Reviews for "Dental Materials"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Dental Materials n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: "I regret that on this occasion your work was considered to be more appropriate for a general dental journal being more clinically oriented and I have, therefore, to reject it."
Dental Materials n/a n/a 15.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The quality of some of the published papers is a mere shame, so I am happy this editor rejected consistently all the papers (2 or 3) we submitted. Imagine that a paper on the fatigue behavior of titanium alloy dental implants.....does not belong to "dental materials". That really makes me wonder. What is more sad is the lack of reaction of Elsevier who decided not to interfere with the decision. papers were never sent for review, they were rejected outright with a standard letter. The Editor ignored all correspondence.