Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Swift desk reject with three sentences explaining why, very much appreciated!
20.0 weeks
26.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
3
Accepted
n/a
n/a
29 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
5.9 weeks
10.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
Motivation: Very fast handling and outstanding managing editor, quality of reviews a bit meh.
n/a
n/a
35 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
39.4 weeks
46.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: The first review round took several months time, probably because it was difficult for the journal to find reviewers. Once reviewers were located, we iterated back and forth very quickly with revisions, and the suggestions improved the paper. Reviews were both cordial and constructive. I was very happy with the review process.
5.3 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
19.3 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
Motivation: Thorough review reports. Long wait until first review results.
28.2 weeks
32.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
Motivation: I was happy with the quality of the reviews and the eventual outcome, but 6.5 months felt like a long time to wait for the initial decision.