Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
20.0 weeks
26.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
3
Accepted
2020
n/a
n/a
29 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
5.9 weeks
10.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Very fast handling and outstanding managing editor, quality of reviews a bit meh.
n/a
n/a
35 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
39.4 weeks
46.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The first review round took several months time, probably because it was difficult for the journal to find reviewers. Once reviewers were located, we iterated back and forth very quickly with revisions, and the suggestions improved the paper. Reviews were both cordial and constructive. I was very happy with the review process.
5.3 weeks
9.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
19.3 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Thorough review reports. Long wait until first review results.
28.2 weeks
32.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2012
Motivation: I was happy with the quality of the reviews and the eventual outcome, but 6.5 months felt like a long time to wait for the initial decision.