Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.6 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2024
Motivation: The entire process was fast, clear, and very professional. They have the best editorial team in absolute terms in the field.
6.4 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2024
Motivation: Review process was extremely smooth and fast. Reviewers comments, although regarding minor revisions, were useful and well argued. The whole process was rather transparent and easy to track in the Taylor and Francis online system. Editors were very responsive and diligent both in finding reviewers and making decision. In my view, this was how academic publishing should be. Very pleasant experience.
6.1 weeks
15.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2022
Motivation: Pretty smooth process from beginning to end; revisions helped to clarify a few things.
5.9 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2019