Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.7 weeks
22.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
Excellent communication from the editor. Process was fairly quick. The reviews' quality were excellent and helped to improve the paper by a large margin.
10.6 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
The review process was very speedy. Still, the reports clearly showed that both the editorial staff and the the evaluators have gone over the text carefully. Feedback was very constructive, with clear reasons for rejection and recommendations for improvement.