Reviews for "Cytometry, Part A"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.0 weeks
15.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
4.0 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
Motivation: The comments were valid, focused on scientific quality and the changes made the paper better in the end. For me who publish in a trans-disciplinary field it was important to have extarnals read it to make sure the language and approach was understandable for experts from different fields.