Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
16.4 weeks
17.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
We waited for a long time for the review. There were 2 reviewers. The first reviewer was very kind and made good contributions. The second reviewer wanted us to add 10 more references which are totally irrelevant, and there was a name repeated in every one of them. We wrote a rebuttal letter disclosing suggested articles irrelevance with our article one by one. Thankfully, our paper was accepted after the first review. Editors and the staff were also very kind and responded to our every requirement very quickly.
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012