Reviews for "Crystal Research and Technology"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Crystal Research and Technology 4.9
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
(very bad)
Motivation: After 2 weeks of submission, we have sent email to the editorial office about the review process of our manuscript, because it was showing "with journal". They told that editor is in vacation. After one month, it was showing the same status "with journal". We have requested the editorial office to cancel of our submission. Next day editor appears with some general comments from the reviewer that reviewer suggested to reject our manuscript.