Reviews for "Cortex"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Cortex 11.7
weeks
11.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: The first review round, that ended up in a rejection, took almost 3 months - we had to chase the editors in order to get an answer on it. Reviewers' comments were useful and much appreciated (and used to further improve our manuscript before resubmitting to another journal, where it was accepted), but the review process was too long.
Cortex 6.0
weeks
14.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Cortex 7.0
weeks
7.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Cortex n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Decision time for immediate rejection was really short wherefore one cannot expect more than a stereotypical rejection letter.
Cortex 12.9
weeks
12.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: We lost too much time with this revision process (without positive results!)
Cortex 11.9
weeks
11.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The referee's suggestion was not so negative, but the Editor decided to reject the manuscript on the basis of her/his comments (just 1 referee).
Cortex 13.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted