Reviews for "Coral Reefs"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Coral Reefs	n/a	n/a	4.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Coral Reefs	Motivation: Quick decision.
Coral Reefs	3.6 weeks	3.7 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Coral Reefs	Motivation: The process was quite fast.
Coral Reefs	8.4 weeks	8.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Rejected
Coral Reefs	Motivation: The duration of the review process is reasonable. Reviewers' comments are comprehensive, with constructive suggestions.
Coral Reefs	25.6 weeks	31.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Coral Reefs	Motivation: The first round of review took far too long. However, reviewers gave really constructive comments, which helped to improve the manuscript a lot.
Coral Reefs	7.6 weeks	19.4 weeks	n/a	2	2 (moderate)	0 (very bad)	Rejected
Coral Reefs	Motivation: The editor and reviewer argued that if the revisions did clarified several issues and resulted in a much clearer manuscript, however, they did had serious concerns regarding the novelty of this study relative to the previous one by two of the authors ". I found such comments inappropriate after a third revision of the manuscript.