Reviews for "Contemporary Economics"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
78.1 weeks	78.1 weeks	n/a	2	0 (very bad)	0 (very bad)	Rejected	2013
Motivation: The editor was impolite, not responsive, irresponsible. Reviewers were unprofessional and showed no strengths and responsibilities in performing their peer review duty. In fact, having reject decisions was nothing new to an experienced author, but the way this journal handled their manuscript and treated the submitter was really terrible and totally unacceptable, an experience that I could not forget after many years.