Reviews for "Construction and Building Materials"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Construction and Building Materials 2.4
weeks
2.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The work of both editors and production was excellent and fast. The reviewers were obviously professionals in the field. I recommend to publish in this journal.
Construction and Building Materials 13.0
weeks
16.0
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Construction and Building Materials 16.6
weeks
16.6
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Low quality and careless review from only one reviewer was the basis of the reject decision.
Construction and Building Materials 8.1
weeks
10.3
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Construction and Building Materials 9.6
weeks
11.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Construction and Building Materials 14.1
weeks
19.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: Long review process but fast publication after acceptance
Construction and Building Materials 1.0
weeks
1.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: It is excellent journal in its impact and discipline.