Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.5 weeks
7.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
0
Rejected
2021
n/a
n/a
17 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation: The review process was very fast. The editor also suggested another journal to submit our article. I am very happy with the quick response and the editor's answer.
n/a
n/a
16 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2019
Motivation: A senior editor did not find the topic a good fit with the journal, however, articles on the same topic have been published in the journal.
30.0 weeks
60.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
0
Rejected
2015
Motivation: Two x 30 month review rounds after the first review only suggested minor revisions. In the second round there was one clearly biased reviewer who did not seem to understand the aim of the research and how it differed from the context of their own research (which they wanted us to cite heavily). The editor was clearly out of depth, seemed to have trouble finding and following up on expert reviewers, and in the end deferred to one very biased reviewer.
10.3 weeks
11.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2013