Reviews for "Computers and Geosciences"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Computers and Geosciences 12.6
weeks
13.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Computers and Geosciences n/a n/a 49.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Computers and Geosciences n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Computers and Geosciences 12.0
weeks
20.7
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: The initial review process took longer than expected. The journal requests that reviews be submitted in 3 weeks, but it took about 12 weeks to get a response. The reviewers didn't seem to have many comments of substance, but revision was requested. This would have been less irksome of the initial decision had come sooner. It is worth noting that the proofing process introduced grammatical and spelling mistakes into the paper that hadn't been present previously.
Computers and Geosciences 15.9
weeks
15.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: The journal requests that reviews be completed within 3 weeks, so it's disappointing that this process took nearly 16 weeks. Typesetting/proofing introduced errors into the manuscript. The editors were flexible about the timing of publication.