Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
17.9 weeks
17.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2021
Motivation: Good quality reviews, relatively fast.
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
14.3 weeks
25.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2013
Motivation: I have no specific complaints concerning the peer review process. The comments were clear and the overall peer-review time was reasonable.
n/a
n/a
30 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2010
Motivation: I cannot say much about Computer Vision and Image Understanding (Elsevier). The paper was sent to this journal and considered "not suitable for publication in the journal" because of "limited interest to the CVIU readership".
That being said, perhaps the paper about image detection and estimation techniques was not suitable to a journal on computer vision...