Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
17.9 weeks
17.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Good quality reviews, relatively fast.
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
14.3 weeks
25.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
I have no specific complaints concerning the peer review process. The comments were clear and the overall peer-review time was reasonable.
n/a
n/a
30 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
I cannot say much about Computer Vision and Image Understanding (Elsevier). The paper was sent to this journal and considered "not suitable for publication in the journal" because of "limited interest to the CVIU readership".
That being said, perhaps the paper about image detection and estimation techniques was not suitable to a journal on computer vision...
That being said, perhaps the paper about image detection and estimation techniques was not suitable to a journal on computer vision...