Reviews for "Computer Physics Communications"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Computer Physics Communications	8.7 weeks	14.1 weeks	n/a	1	5 (excellent)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Computer Physics Communications	Motivation: Note that CPC seems to be comfortable with relying on the input of only one reviewer, which may be seen as an advantage or a disadvantage. Overall, the entire reviewing and editorial processes were handled quite agreeably.
Computer Physics Communications	5.0 weeks	23.3 weeks	n/a	1	2 (moderate)	3 (good)	Accepted
Computer Physics Communications	Motivation: While I was initially impressed with the speed of the first review round, the second one felt like an eternity, so I contacted the editor about the status of my manuscript. I was very politely informed that they had been having trouble with the first reviewer, had attempted to muster alternative reviewers, and finally had to wait for the first reviewer to come around. Note that CPC seems to be comfortable with relying on the input of only one reviewer, which in this case may have been a disadvantage.
Computer Physics Communications	18.7 weeks	19.3 weeks	n/a	1	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Accepted
Computer Physics Communications	Motivation: It took quite a while for the first round to come to a conclusion, so I had almost forgotten about the manuscript. However, I was happy to hear that the manuscript would be accepted after some minor changes. Note that CPC seems to be comfortable with relying on the input of only one reviewer, which may be seen as an advantage or a disadvantage. Overall, the entire reviewing and editorial processes were handled quite agreeably.
Computer Physics Communications	6.0 weeks	11.8 weeks	n/a	1	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted
Computer Physics Communications	Motivation: The reviewer's comments were helpful and practical. Also, the editor's notes helped to improve the manuscript. Generally, the communication with the journal was easy, fast and constructive.